| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Subject Number: |
123 |
|
|
|
LAM data file: |
010321_1_in_anon |
| DOB: |
2 May 1977 (Age 23) |
|
|
|
Date of Report: |
15-Mar-01 |
|
| Language
Representation Methods: (check all available) |
Location: |
Wooster, OH |
| _X_ SMP;
_X_ SEM; _X_
WPR; _X_ SPE; _X_ OWS* |
Examiner: |
B. Romich |
|
| Selection
technique: |
Keyboard |
|
|
|
Transcriber: |
K. Hill |
|
| AAC System: |
Unity 128 (12 mo.) on Pathfinder (5 mo.) |
Sample time: |
57 minutes |
| Number of
selections per letter in spelling: |
|
1 |
|
|
|
| Number of
total array selections when spelling: |
|
128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Language
Sample Context (check) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ___ |
Conversation (# Partners ___) |
|
___ |
Natural Environment |
|
| _X*_ |
Interview |
|
|
|
___ |
Other: ________________________ |
| ___ |
Narrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ___ |
Picture description |
|
|
* Conducted remotely via AOL Instant Messenger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Section 1:
Utterance-Based Summary Measures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Total
utterances |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Complete
utterances (%) |
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Method
of Generating Utterances (SNUG %) |
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Mean
Length of Utterance in Words (MLU-w) |
16.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Mean
Length of Utterance in Morphemes (MLU-m) |
18.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Average
Communication Rate (words / minute) |
11.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Peak
Communication Rate (words / minute) |
14.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
everything is remembered
by myself and I/'m actually my Unity teacher |
|
|
|
because I taught myself by play/ing around
with it |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Section 2:
Word-Based Summary Measures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Total
Number of Words |
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Diffrerent
Word Roots |
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Core
Vocabulary Use (%) |
|
|
85% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| * SMP
= Single Meaning Pictures; SEM = SEMantic Compaction |
| WPR = Word
PRediction; SPE = SPElling; OWS = Orthographic
Word Selection |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Method
of Generating Words (%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Communication
Rate by Language Representation Method (words / minute) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Selection
Rate (bits / second) |
|
|
5.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Rate
Index (words / bit) |
|
|
0.037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. Errors
per Selected Word (%) |
|
|
2.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Errors
per Spelled and Predicted Word (%) |
0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q. Deletions
per error (%) |
|
|
0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Section 3:
Appendices (attached) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. ___
LAM data |
|
|
U. ___
Frequency order word list |
|
|
S. ___
Utterances |
|
|
V. ___
Word list by method of generation |
|
|
T. ___
Alphabetic order word list |
|
W. ___ Text version report |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| For additional information on methods, tools, services, and evidence
to support AAC evidence-based practice, visit the web site of the AAC
Institute. AAC Institute is a
not-for-profit charitable organization dedicated to the most effective
communication for people who rely on AAC.
Additional analyses of language samples can be performed using
Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts (S.A.L.T.) available at http://www.waisman.wisc.edu/salt/. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| AAC Institute provides the service of generating this AAC Performance
Report from language samples collected using language activity monitoring
(LAM). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
030818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
